![]() |
« Seeing through the Greenwashing Whiteout (SIJ) | Main | Should Washington state do more to support clean tech? (Cook) »
Michael Morris, chairman, president and chief executive of American Electric Power, which runs the nation's largest electrical transmission system, told the Associated Press he sees a dire situation ahead for the power grid, and the U.S. could eventually face power rationing.
I've been talking with various people in the electric energy industry about the eventuality of power rationing. Few want to call it that, but some admit they're planning for it.
In "5 years after big blackout, nation still vulnerable," AP reporter Mark Williams paints a dark future for the electric grid. AEP's Michael Morris enumerated for Williams the problems facing the grid: Demand will grow by 29 percent between 2006 and 2030; excess generating capacity is shrinking; the cost to construct new power plants is soaring; new coal and nuclear plants are being blocked by host states; new transmission lines are facing local opposition.
My take: We have power rationing today. It's called demand response and -- for now -- it's voluntary. The technologies and tariffs being developed for demand response are very similar to the mechanisms needed to implement involuntary power rationing. Those businesses with the technology and experience in place will fare better than others in that event. Meanwhile, energy efficiency represents a vast untapped resource for giving grid operators more time to upgrade.
Sub-Saharan Africa's economic growth outstripped its ability to supply power -- and outran countries' investments in infrastructure -- in 2007. Rolling blackouts and on-site generators are now commonplace in Nigeria, Angola, Ghana and South Africa. The crisis delayed any hope for deploying large-scale renewable energy there. The short-term solution for Africa is, unfortunately, fossil-fueled generation.
Related blog: Energy Priorities - "Africa Power Crisis "
Morris anticipates demand will exceed supply in the United States in 10 to 20 years, at which point the blackouts here will increase.
! Login below to post a comment.
Unregistered users, sign up now
Or post anonymously (About this feature)

Recent entries
· Ocean Power Progress Ebbs with Environmental Questions
· City Light Recognized for Linking Performance Indicators to Customer Service
· Financial crisis hinders renewable energy projects
· Get that Hospital LEED Certified, STAT!
· Amtrak Picking Up Speed
RSS/Web feeds (help)




· Energy Priorities
· Energy Minute Podcasts
Under the Globe
· Green Building Blog
· Seattle Environmental Blog ("Here's the thing")
· Dateline Earth (another blog written by journalists)
· Electric Vehicle Guide
Sustainable forestry
· Small Forest Owner - my blog about trying to manage timber

Dateline Earth
Reader blog: Energy: Strategies, Policy & Best Practices
Reader blog: Building Seattle Green
Reader blog: Green Human
Reader blog: Living Simply
more

101 Elliott Ave. W.
Seattle, WA 98119
(206) 448-8000
Home Delivery: (206) 464-2121 or (800) 542-0820
seattlepi.com serves about 1.7 million unique visitors
and 30 million page views each month.
Send comments to newmedia@seattlepi.com
Send investigative tips to iteam@seattlepi.com
©1996-2007 Seattle Post-Intelligencer
Terms of Use/Privacy Policy

Posted by groovyjoker at 9/12/08 5:10 p.m.
The real key is conservation. Ask any PUD. Even ask the Department of Energy. If you want to call rationing a type of Conservation, perhaps we should. You can save more energy by conserving and becoming energy efficient, then you can by producing more, which requires more infrastructure or upgraded infrastructure in many cases.
Waste not, want not. Focus on conservation and efficiency first, and when you have exhausted those, then look to building new sources of power.
Regarding the transmission lines - I think FERC has ultimate siting authority over the transmission line improvement project they are overseeing across the nation. Local opposition will be considered, but it won't stop the upgrades.